McEldowney et al v. G.D. Searle LLC et al

Case Number: 3:2005cv04783
Filed: November 21, 2005
Court: California Northern District Court
Office: San Francisco Office
Presiding Judge: Charles R. Breyer
Nature of Suit: Fraud or Truth-In-Lending
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
December 22, 2010 63 Opinion or Order of the Court STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE. Ruth M. Dickman, Donald H. Fugate, Patti Stevens-Rucker, Robin Slaton terminated. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 12/22/10. (mcl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/22/2010)
December 18, 2009 60 Opinion or Order of the Court STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE; James S. Elliott, Wilma J. Finley, Wilma J. Finley, Margate L. Foote, Nagel T. Franklin, Nolan T. Garrett, James Goodin, Sandy Hunt, Lloyd Mendenhall, Naomi Miller, Teresa Milton, Carrie Monk, Donald J. Nall, Charles R. Nelson, Mary Ann Orton, Mary M. Parish, Beverly J. Perrin, Jack L. Powell, Orvida Proffitt, William J. Redmon, Jan H. Schoenhoest, Greg A. Sears, Helen Sizemore, Bertie Skok, David M. Smith, Bernie A. Stone, Herbert H. Stoops, Rodney Summerville, Wanda M. Talley, Eula Williams, Beryl Wilson, John A. Wilson, Joe W. Wright, Wayne D. Dooley and Linda L. Earl terminated.. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 12/16/09. (slh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/18/2009)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: McEldowney et al v. G.D. Searle LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?