Miles v. Makishima et al
3:2006cv01295 |
February 22, 2006 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Francisco Office |
Maxine M. Chesney |
Labor: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 73 ORDER STRIKING REQUEST FOR DIRECT APPEAL CERTIFICATION. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on October 22, 2008. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/22/2008) |
Filing 64 ORDER STRIKING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO DISQUALIFY. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on October 7, 2008. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/7/2008) |
Filing 57 RELATED CASE ORDER. Miles v. Makishima, et al., C-08-4091 JSW, and Miles v. Makishima, et al., C-08-4375 MHP, are related to Miles v. Makishima, et al., C-06-1295 MMC. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on October 2, 2008. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/2/2008) |
Filing 54 ORDER RE: NOTICE OF REMOVAL. The Notice of Removal is stricken, and the action is remanded to the Superior Court of the State of California, County of San Mateo. No further filings shall be accepted in this closed case. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on September 29, 2008. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/29/2008) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Miles v. Makishima et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.