Storus Corporation v. Restoration Hardware, Inc. et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|February 8, 2008
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED APPLICATION TO EXTEND DATES FOR PRE-TRIAL DELIVERABLES. The deadline to file the pre-trial statement and joint instructions is continued to February 19, 2008. The deadline to file motions in limine is continued to February 15, 2008; the deadline to file oppositions is continued to February 21, 2008. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on February 8, 2008. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/8/2008)
|February 7, 2008
ORDER WITHDRAWING REFERENCE. In light of a recent change in the Court's trial schedule, the reference to Judge Nielsen is withdrawn. Having read and considered the papers filed in support of and in opposition to plaintiff's motion for parti al summary judgment, the Court finds plaintiff's motion appropriate for resolution on the papers, and, accordingly, deems the matter submitted on the papers. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on February 7, 2008. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/7/2008)
|February 1, 2008
ORDER OF REFERENCE. Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of Trademark Infringement is referred to the Honorable Wm. Fremming Nielsen. Counsel will be advised of the date, time and place of the hearing on said motion by notice from Judge Nielsen's chambers. The February 1, 2008 hearing before the undersigned is vacated. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on February 1, 2008. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/1/2008)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?