Bridgestone Americas Holding Inc et al v. Chemtura Corporation et al
3:2006cv05700 |
September 19, 2006 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Francisco Office |
Martin J. Jenkins |
Anti-Trust |
15 U.S.C. ยง 15 Antitrust Litigation |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 268 ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AS TO DEFENDANT JAMES J. CONWAY. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on September 4, 2009. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/4/2009) |
Filing 253 ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION TO SUBMIT TO ARBITRATION; SETTING DEADLINE TO FILE JOINT STATUS REPORT. Federal court proceedings are stayed pending completion of arbitration. The parties shall file a joint status report no later than March 20, 2009, and every six months thereafter. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on September 23, 2008. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/23/2008) |
Filing 250 ORDER CONTINUING STATUS CONFERENCE. The Status Conference is continued from September 19, 2008 to October 3, 2008. A Joint Status Statement shall be filed no later than September 26, 2008. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on September 15, 2008. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/15/2008) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Bridgestone Americas Holding Inc et al v. Chemtura Corporation et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.