Barragan-Campos v. Chertoff et al
Case Number: 3:2006cv07057
Filed: November 14, 2006
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Francisco Office
Presiding Judge: Charles R. Breyer
Nature of Suit: Deportation
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 22, 2006 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER re 5 Emergency MOTION to Stay Removal and for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Rogelio Barragan-Campos. Petitioner not to be removed from the United States. DHS/ICE directed to immediately release petitioner from custody. Standard administra tive order of supervision to be in effect, that petiitioner remains a resident at his lawfully disclosed residence in Fresno, CA pending resolution of this action, is subject to normal work routine, obeys all laws and orders not inconsistent with thi s order; Order of Supervision shall not require Petitioner to travel to any DHS or ICE office or be subject to electronic monitoring. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 11/22/06. (epb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/22/2006) Additional attachment(s) added on 11/22/2006 (epb, COURT STAFF).
November 17, 2006 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER setting status for 11/21 at 9:00 a.m.. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 11/17/2006. (crblc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/17/2006)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Barragan-Campos v. Chertoff et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?