Plaintiff Mediostream, Inc. alleged that it had entered into an agreement with defendant Priddis Music, Inc. under which defendant purported to grant plaintiff a non-exclusive right to encode, host, integrate and make available tracks for plaintiff's online karaoke business. Plaintiff further alleged that defendant Warner/Chappell Music, Inc. subsequently contacted plaintiff, asserted that plaintiff had infringed upon its copyrights, and indicated that defendant Priddis Music had no rights to transfer to plaintiff.
Mediostream Inc. |
Priddis Music Inc., Warner/Chappell Music Inc., Chappell & Co. Inc., Cotillion Music Inc., Dayspring Music LLC, Rightsong Music Inc., Unichappell Music Inc., Walden Music Inc., Warner/Tamerlane Publishing Corp., WB Music Corp., Word Music LLC and Wordspring Music LLC |
Priddis Music Inc. |
Mediostream Inc. |
3:2007cv02127 |
April 17, 2007 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Francisco Office |
Santa Clara |
Phyllis J. Hamilton |
Copyright |
17 U.S.C. ยง 101 Copyright Infringement |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing
21
CLERK'S LETTER dated 9/25/07 to the U.S.D.C. Middle District of Tennessee re transfer of case. (far, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/25/2007)
|
Filing
20
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO TRANSFER by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton granting 12 Motion to Transfer Case (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/25/2007)
|
Filing
19
ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO CONTINUE THE SEPTEMBER 27, 2007 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton granting 17 Motion to Continue (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/13/2007)
|
Filing
16
Memorandum in Opposition re 12 MOTION to Dismiss Amended Complaint MOTION to Transfer Case MOTION to Stay PLAINTIFF'S OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT OR ALTERNATIVELY, TRANSFER OR STAY ACTION filed byMediostream Inc.. (Schmid, Frear) (Filed on 8/28/2007)
|
Filing
15
Renotice motion hearing re 12 Motion to Dismiss, Transfer or Stay Amended Complaint filed by Chappell & Co. Inc., Cotillion Music Inc., Dayspring Music LLC, Rightsong Music Inc., Unichappell Music Inc., Walden Music Inc., Warner/Tamerlane Publishing Corp., WB Music Corp., Word Music LLC, Wordspring Music LLC, Warner/Chappell Music Inc.. Motion Hearing set for 9/26/2007 09:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco. (Mayer, Marc) (Filed on 8/10/2007) Modified on 8/13/2007 (far, COURT STAFF).
|
Filing
11
ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO CONTINUE THE JULY 26, 2007 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE re 7 Stipulation,, filed by Dayspring Music LLC, Warner/Chappell Music Inc., Warner/Tamerlane Publishing Corp., Wordspring Music LLC, Cotillion Music Inc., Walden Music Inc., Chappell & Co. Inc., WB Music Corp., Unichappell Music Inc., Rightsong Music Inc., Word Music LLC. Initial Case Management Conference set for 9/27/2007 02:30 PM. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 7/23/07. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/23/2007)
|
Filing
5
CLERK'S NOTICE re: Amended Complaint (doc 4); Failure to E-File and/or Failure to Register as an E-Filer (far, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/14/2007)
|
Filing
3
REPORT on the filing or determination of an action regarding copyright (cc: form mailed to register). (far, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/18/2007)
|
Filing
2
ADR SCHEDULING ORDER: Case Management Statement due by 7/19/2007. Case Management Conference set for 7/26/2007 02:30 PM. (far, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/17/2007)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.