Rosenfeld v. Federal Bureau of Investigation et al
Plaintiff: Seth Rosenfeld
Defendant: Federal Bureau of Investigation and United States Department of Justice
Case Number: 3:2007cv03240
Filed: September 23, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Francisco Office
Presiding Judge: Marilyn H. Patel
Nature of Suit: Freedom of Information Act
Cause of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 552 Freedom of Information Act

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 17, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 160 ORDER by Judge Edward M. Chen Granting 149 Plaintiff's Motion for an Award of Attorneys' Fees and Costs. (emcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/17/2012)
March 28, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 146 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 145 Pursuant To Local Civil Rule 6-2 To Entry of Judgment and To Extend Time To Request Fees; and [Proposed] Order filed by United States Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 3/28/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/28/2012)
March 5, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 143 REDACTED ORDER by Judge Edward M. Chen granting 133 Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment and denying 137 Defendants' Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (emclc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/5/2012)
February 11, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 113 ORDER RE DISCLOSURE: Signed by Judge Marilyn Hall Patel on 2/11/2011. (awb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/11/2011)
September 1, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 98 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. Signed by Judge Marilyn Hall Patel on 08/31/10. (sis, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/1/2010)
September 23, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 70 STIPULATION AND ORDER; Status Conference continued to 11/2/2009 03:00 PM in Courtroom 15, 18th Floor, San Francisco; Signed by Judge Marilyn Hall Patel on 9/23/2009. (awb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/23/2009)
February 5, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 58 STIPULATION AND ORDER extending deadline to and including 2/5/2009 to file a joint case management conference statement; Signed by Judge Marilyn Hall Patel on 2/4/2009. (awb, COURT-STAFF) (Filed on 2/5/2009)
December 17, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 56 STIPULATION AND ORDER: Further Case Management Conference reset for 2/9/2009 03:00 PM; Joint CMC statements to be filed by 2/2/2009; Signed by Judge Marilyn Hall Patel on 12/16/2008. (awb, COURT-STAFF) (Filed on 12/17/2008)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rosenfeld v. Federal Bureau of Investigation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Seth Rosenfeld
Represented By: David A Greene
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Federal Bureau of Investigation
Represented By: Ila Casy Deiss
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States Department of Justice
Represented By: Ila Casy Deiss
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?