Roots Ready Made Garments Co. W.L.L. v. Gap, Inc. et al
Roots Ready Made Garments Co. W.L.L. |
Gap, Inc., Gap International Sales, Inc., Banana Republic, LLC and Old Navy, LLC |
3:2007cv03363 |
June 26, 2007 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Francisco Office |
San Francisco |
Joseph C. Spero |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 295 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' REQUEST TO SET UP ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT FOR PRETRIAL CONFERENCE ON SEPTEMBER 26, 2008; re 293 Notice (Other) filed by Gap, Inc. Signed by Hon. Judge Charles R. Breyer on 9/25/2008. (ls, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/25/2008) |
Filing 285 ORDER TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL; re docket 264 . Signed by Hon. Judge Charles R. Breyer on 9/24/2008. (ls, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/24/2008) Modified on 9/26/2008 (mcl, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 233 ORDER Rescheduling Settlement Conference Settlement Conference set for 10/2/2008 09:30 AM. Updated settlement conference letter due on 9/29/2008 by facsimile to chambers.. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 9/12/08. (fj, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/12/2008) |
Filing 126 ORDER by Judge Breyer granting 101 Motion for Order Upholding Confidentiality Designations; granting 111 Motion for Order Upholding Confidentiality Designations (crblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/1/2008) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.