Point v. United States Postal Service et al
| 3:2007cv06398 |
| December 18, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Motor Vehicle Office |
| James Larson |
| Plaintiff |
| U.S. Government Defendant |
| 28:2671 Federal Tort Claims Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
40
STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE re 39 . Signed by Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte on 3/3/09. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/3/2009)
|
|
Filing
38
ORDER re 37 Proposed Order filed by United States of America. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte on January 8, 2009. (edllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/9/2009)
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER OF CONDITIONAL DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte on 12/3/08. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/3/2008)
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER APPROVING REQUEST FOR TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE AT MEDIATIONSigned by Judge Wayne D. Brazil on 11/18/2008. (wdblc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/18/2008)
|
|
Filing
33
STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING Deadline for Mediation re 32 . Signed by Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte on 11/17/08. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/17/2008)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Point v. United States Postal Service et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
