United States of America v. Approximately $61,386.00 in United States Currency
United States of America |
Approximately $61,386.00 in United States Currency |
3:2008cv00826 |
February 6, 2008 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Francisco Office |
San Francisco |
Maxine M. Chesney |
Drug Related Seizure of Property |
21 U.S.C. ยง 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 44 JUDGMENT OF FORFEITURE. Defendant $24,554.40 plus accrued interest is forfeited to the United States for disposition by the Attorney General in accordance with law. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on October 29, 2010. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/29/2010) |
Filing 41 ORDER APPROVING JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. The Caes Management Conference is continued from September 17, 2010 to November 19, 2010. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on September 13, 2010. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/13/2010) |
Filing 33 ORDER CONTINUING CMC. The Case Management Conference is continued from April 2, 2010 to April 30, 2010. No further Case Management Statement is required. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on March 31, 2010. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/31/2010) |
Filing 30 ORDER CONTINUING CONFERENCE. The Case Management Conference is continued from February 26, 2010 to April 2, 2010. A Joint Case Management Statement shall be filed by March 26, 2010. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on February 17, 2010. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/17/2010) |
Filing 26 ORDER APPROVING JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. The Case Management Conference currently scheduled for September 25, 2009 is continued to October 23, 2009. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on September 4, 2009. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/4/2009) |
Filing 20 ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. The Case Management Conference is continued from January 9, 2009 to March 20, 2009. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on January 5, 2009. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/5/2009) |
Filing 18 ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. The Case Management Conference is continued from October 10, 2008 to January 9, 2009. A Joint Case Management Conference Statement shall be filed no later than January 2, 2009. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on October 6, 2008. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/6/2008) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: United States of America v. Approximately $61,386.00 in United States Currency | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: United States of America | |
Represented By: | Susan Belloni Gray |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Approximately $61,386.00 in United States Currency | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.