Polk v. Cavin et al
| Susan Mae Polk |
| James Cavin, Matt Chertkow and Contra Costa County Sheriff's Department |
| 3:2008cv01483 |
| March 17, 2008 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| Madera |
| Maxine M. Chesney |
| Prisoner: Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
292
ORDER DENYING 290 PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on August 13, 2013.(mmcsecS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/13/2013)
|
|
Filing
258
ORDER DENYING 255 , 256 , 257 REQUEST FOR LEAVE TO FILE MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME; DENYING REQUEST FOR LEAVE TO FILE MOTION TO COMPEL AND FOR SANCTIONS; DENYING REQUEST FOR LEAVE TO FILE MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on March 19, 2013.(mmcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/19/2013)
|
|
Filing
251
ORDER DENYING 249 PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO COMPEL AND FOR SANCTIONS. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on February 19, 2013.(mmcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/19/2013)
|
|
Filing
233
ORDER GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR EXTENSION TO SUBMIT OBJECTIONS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S ORDER OF NOVEMBER 27, 2012. The Court extends to January 25, 2013 the deadline for plaintiff to file and serve any objections to the Magistrate Judge's order of November 27, 2012. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on January 2, 2013. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/2/2013)
|
|
Filing
228
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; DENYING REQUEST FOR STAY. The deadline to file opposition to defendants' motion for summary judgment is extended to February 27, 2013. The deadline to file a reply remains as scheduled, specifically, within fifteen days of the date on which plaintiff's opposition is filed. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on December 6, 2012. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/6/2012)
|
|
Filing
223
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST TO EXTEND FUTURE DEADLINES. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on November 26, 2012. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/26/2012)
|
|
Filing
209
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF A LIMITED EXTENSION OF TIME. Plaintiff's opposition to defendants' motion for summary judgment is due on or before December 6, 2012. Defendants' reply is due 15 days thereafter. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on October 16, 2012. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/16/2012) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/16/2012: # 1 Certificate of Service) (tlS, COURT STAFF).
|
|
Filing
107
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 99 MOTION to Dismiss Defendants Gibson and Roberts's Notice of Motion; Motion to Dismiss Under FRCP 12(b)(6), or Alternatively Motion to Sever Under FRCP 21 filed by Roberts, Gibson Replies due by 1/18/2012. Responses due by 1/3/2012.. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on 11/9/11. (tlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/9/2011)
|
|
Filing
92
ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR COSTS ON APPEAL; DIRECTIONS TO CLERK. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on October 17, 2011. (mmcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/17/2011)
|
|
Filing
63
ORDER GRANTING 62 EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO OPPOSE DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS TO DISMISS; SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on February 2, 2010. (mmcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/2/2010)
|
|
Filing
60
ORDER GRANTING 56 PLAINTIFF'S SECOND REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME; DENYING 56 APPLICATION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on December 7, 2009. (mmcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/7/2009)
|
|
Filing
54
ORDER DENYING 42 , 47 , 50 , PLAINTIFF'S MOTIONS FOR RECONSIDERATION AND PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION; STRIKING 51 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE; GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME; SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on October 2, 2009. (mmcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/2/2009)
|
|
Filing
41
ORDER GRANTING 36 DEFENDANTS GIBSON AND ROBERTS'S FIRST REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE DISPOSITIVE MOTION. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on September 3, 2009. (mmcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/3/2009)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER DENYING 23 MOTIONS FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND 31 APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on August 12, 2009. (mmcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/12/2009)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER OF SERVICE; DENYING 13 MOTION TO DISQUALIFY. The Clerk of the Court shall issue summons and the United States Marshal shall serve, without prepayment of fees, a copy of the 11 Third Amended complaint in this matter, all attachments thereto, and a copy of this order upon: (1) Defendants Deputy James Cavin, Sgt. Matt Chertkow and Sheriff Warren Rupf at the Contra Costa County Sheriff's Department; (2) defendants Sgt. Roberts and Sgt. Gibson at the Central California Women's Facility in Chowchilla; and (3) defendant Warden Gail Patrick at the California at the California Department of Corrections in Sacramento. The Clerk shall also mail a courtesy copy of the complaint and this order to the California Attorney Gener al's Office. Within ninety (90) days of the date this order is filed, defendants shall file a motion for summary judgment or other dispositive motion with respect to the claim found to be cognizable. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on April 30, 2009. (mmcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/30/2009) Modified on 5/4/2009 (aaa, COURT STAFF).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
