Shervin v. City of Newark, California et al
Amir Shervin |
City of Newark, California, Robert Douglas, Richard Lopez and William Shaffer |
3:2008cv01631 |
March 26, 2008 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Civil Rights: Other Office |
Marin |
Vaughn R. Walker |
Defendant |
Federal Question |
42:1983 Civil Rights Act |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 190 REVISED ORDER GRANTING REQUEST FOR PREPARATION OF TRANSCRIPT (SI, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/19/2011) |
Filing 189 ORDER GRANTING REQUEST FOR PREPARATION OF TRANSCRIPT (SI, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/12/2011) |
Filing 169 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE why plaintiff Shirin Shervin's claims should not be dismissed. Show Cause Response due by 9/17/2010. Application for appointment of guardian ad litem, Doc #153, is DENIED. (vrwlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/4/2010) |
Filing 162 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE why defendants' motion for summary judgment, Doc #155, should not be granted. Show Cause Response due by 2/22/2010. Signed by Judge Walker on February 4, 2010. (vrwlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/4/2010) |
Filing 139 ORDER to be prepared to discuss case management plan on 8/13/09. (vrwlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/12/2009) |
Filing 100 ORDER re 99 Affidavit filed by Amir Shervin, 98 Proposed Order filed by Amir Shervin. Shirin Shervin's claims are not dismissed. (vrwlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/10/2009) |
Filing 90 ORDER re 33 directing further explanation from Newark counsel (vrwlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/21/2009) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.