Consumer Solutions REO, LLC v. White
Plaintiff: Consumer Solutions REO, LLC
Defendant: Babatunde White
Case Number: 3:2008cv02308
Filed: May 5, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: Real Property: Foreclosure Office
County: Contra Costa
Presiding Judge: James Larson
Nature of Suit: Defendant
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:1446 Petition for Removal

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 26, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 30 document filed in error
November 18, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER grantinng Pltfs re # 18 . request for leave to e.file (ts, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/18/2008)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Consumer Solutions REO, LLC v. White
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Babatunde White
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Consumer Solutions REO, LLC
Represented By: Scott James Jackson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?