Perth v. Davis et al
John Eric Perth |
Louis Davis and Sue Ann Davis |
3:2008cv03115 |
June 27, 2008 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Francisco Office |
Alameda |
Charles R. Breyer |
Elizabeth D. Laporte |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract |
Defendant |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 87 ORDER by Judge Charles R. Breyer granting 84 Motion to Compel. (crblc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/14/2009) |
Filing 82 ORDER. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 5/8/09. (be, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/12/2009) |
Filing 68 ORDER CONTINUING HEARING re Defendants' Motion for Order Permitting Defendant to Withrdraw Deemend Admitted Admission 63 . Hearing reset for 5/5/2009 09:00 AM in Courtroom E, 15th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte on 3/27/09. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/27/2009) |
Filing 51 ORDER of substitution re 50 Notice of Change In Counsel filed by Louis Davis, Sue Ann Davis, Attorney Vernon C. Goins, II and Brian K. Hilliard terminated.. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 1/28/09. (be, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/28/2009) |
Filing 30 ORDER by Judge Charles R. Breyer denying 17 Motion to Dismiss. (crblc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/14/2008) |
Filing 16 ORDER for extension of time to respond to complaint re 14 Stipulation filed by John Eric Perth. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 9/04/08. (be, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/5/2008) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.