Shade v. Gorman et al
Plaintiff: Gregory Shade
Defendant: Daniel Patrick Gorman, Framebird Media, Chip R. Beasley and Andrew Ellis
Case Number: 3:2008cv03471
Filed: July 18, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: Copyright Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Susan Illston
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 17:101 Copyright Infringement

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 15, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 97 ORDER re 95 (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/15/2009)
March 26, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 80 ORDER DISMISSING CASE with prejudice upon settlement. Within 90 days from the date thereof, that settlement has not in fact occurred, the foregoing order shall be vacated and this cause shall forthwith be restored to the calendar for further proceedings. Signed by Judge Illston on 3/26/09. (ts, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/26/2009)
February 2, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 70 NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE AND SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE ORDER. Settlement Conference set for 3/24/2009 AT 09:30 AM. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 2/2/9. (klh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/2/2009)
January 28, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 66 ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS; DENYING DEFENDANTS' ANTI-SLAPP MOTION re 27 . Plaintiff shall file an Amended Complaint by 2/6/09. (SI, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/28/2009)
January 26, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 65 ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION re 7 . (SI, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/26/2009)
November 5, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 57 ORDER continuing motion and cmc to 12/12/08 at 9:00 a.m. and 2:00 p.m., respectively. Signed by Judge Illston on 11/5/08. (ts, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/5/2008)
October 28, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 50 ORDER dismissing Ellis re 44 . Signed by Judge Illston on 10/28/08. (ts, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/28/2008)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Shade v. Gorman et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gregory Shade
Represented By: Peter Joseph Parisot
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Daniel Patrick Gorman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Framebird Media
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Chip R. Beasley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew Ellis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?