Universal Trading and Investment Co. v. Dugsbery, Inc et al
| Universal Trading and Investment Co. |
| Dugsbery, Inc, Pavlo I. Lazarenko, Lady Lake Investment Corp., Orby International Ltd., United Energy Systems of Ukraine, PFG and Trustees for Pavlo I. Lazarenko |
| 3:2008cv03632 |
| July 29, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Contract: Recovery/Enforcement Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| James Larson |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 28:1331 Fed. Question |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
138
ORDER by Judge Charles R. Breyer denying 125 Motion for Reconsideration ; denying 134 Motion for Sanctions (crblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/5/2011)
|
|
Filing
123
ORDER by Judge Charles R. Breyer granting 110 Motion to Dismiss (crblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/7/2011)
|
|
Filing
108
INITIAL DISCOVERY ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bernard Zimmerman on 11/3/2010. (bzsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/3/2010)
|
|
Filing
95
ORDER by Judge Charles R. Breyer granting 93 Motion Lifting Stay (crblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/13/2010)
|
|
Filing
91
ORDER Lifting Stay for Entry of Same re 90 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Universal Trading and Investment Co.. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 7/7/2010. (be, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/8/2010)
|
|
Filing
89
ORDER Lifting Stay for Entry of Dismissal with prejudice as to Aurelio Ferrari only re 88 Notice of Acceptance with Offer of Judgment filed by Universal Trading and Investment Co.,. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 1/22/2010. (be, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/27/2010)
|
|
Filing
75
ORDER extending time to respond to first amended complaint re 74 Stipulation filed by Aurelio Ferrari. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 1/15/09. (be, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/15/2009)
|
|
Filing
66
ORDER 64 Stipulation, 55 MOTION to Dismiss MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(B)(2); and Def. Lazarenko's Motion to Quash Service of Process Pursuant to Federaul Rules of Civil Proced ure 12(B)(4) and (5) MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(B)(2); and Def. Lazarenko's Motion to Quash Service of Process Pursuant to Federaul Rules of Civil Procedure 12(B)(4) and (5).Response to 1st Amended Complaint 12/15/2008 Responses due by 1/6/2009. Replies due by 1/9/2009. Motion Hearing set for 1/16/2009 10:00 AM in Courtroom 8, 19th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 12/12/08. (be, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/15/2008)
|
|
Filing
54
ORDER taking motion hearing off court's schedule re 49 Stipulation filed by Universal Trading and Investment Co., Motions terminated:. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 12/02/08. (be, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/2/2008)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER re 18 Stipulation, filed by Universal Trading and Investment Co., Set/Reset Deadlines as to 18 Stipulation, 15 MOTION to Dismiss Verified Complaint for Judgment Creditor's Remedies to Satisfy Judgment, Or in the Alternative, Reque st for More Definite Statement; Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support. Motion Hearing set for 10/24/2008 02:00 PM in Courtroom 8, 19th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 9/22/08. (be, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/22/2008)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER to reschedule case management conference re 12 Response filed by Pavlo I. Lazarenko. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 9/2/08. (be, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/2/2008)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
