Posadas v. Martel

Posadas v. Martel

Petitioner:	Juan Posadas
Respondent:	Michael Martel
Case Number:	3:2008cv04341
Filed:	September 16, 2008
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office:	Habeas Corpus (General) Office
County:	Amador
Presiding Judge:	Maxine M. Chesney
Nature of Suit:	None
Cause of Action:	Federal Question
Jury Demanded By:	28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
December 7, 2009	Filing 16 ORDER DENYING 10 , 13 PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL; GRANTING 15 REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE TRAVERSE. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on December 7, 2009. (mmcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/7/2009)
July 8, 2009	Filing 4 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. The Clerk of the Court shall serve by certified mail a copy of this order, the petition and all attachments thereto (Docket No.1) on respondent and respondent's counsel, the Attorney General for the State of California. Resp ondent shall file with the Court and serve on petitioner, within ninety (90) days of the date this order is filed, an answer conforming in all respects to Rule 5 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, showing cause why a writ of habeas corpus should not be granted based on petitioner's cognizable claims. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on July 8, 2009. (mmcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/8/2009) Modified on 7/10/2009 (aaa, COURT STAFF).

Date Filed

Document Text

December 7, 2009

Filing 16 ORDER DENYING 10 , 13 PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL; GRANTING 15 REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE TRAVERSE. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on December 7, 2009. (mmcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/7/2009)

July 8, 2009

Filing 4 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. The Clerk of the Court shall serve by certified mail a copy of this order, the petition and all attachments thereto (Docket No.1) on respondent and respondent's counsel, the Attorney General for the State of California. Resp ondent shall file with the Court and serve on petitioner, within ninety (90) days of the date this order is filed, an answer conforming in all respects to Rule 5 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, showing cause why a writ of habeas corpus should not be granted based on petitioner's cognizable claims. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on July 8, 2009. (mmcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/8/2009) Modified on 7/10/2009 (aaa, COURT STAFF).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Posadas v. Martel
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Juan Posadas
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Michael Martel
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?