Chan v. Evans
Petitioner: Juan J. Chan
Respondent: M. S. Evans
Case Number: 3:2008cv04399
Filed: September 19, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: Habeas Corpus (General) Office
County: Monterey
Presiding Judge: Maxine M. Chesney
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 4, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 3 JUDGMENT: The petition is hereby DISMISSED, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b) and without prejudice, as a second or second successive petition. (tl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/4/2008)
November 3, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on November 3, 2008. (mmcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/3/2008)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Chan v. Evans
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Juan J. Chan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: M. S. Evans
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?