Pique v. County of Contra Costa et al
| Treon Pique |
| County of Contra Costa, Contra Costa County Sheriff's Department, Warren Rupf and Robert Jones |
| 3:2008cv04408 |
| September 19, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| Alameda |
| Maxine M. Chesney |
| Both |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
32
ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on August 4, 2009. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/4/2009)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO SUBMIT CHAMBERS COPY IN COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL ORDER 45 AND THE COURT'S STANDING ORDERS. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on April 6, 2009. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/6/2009)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO COMPLETE MEDIATION TO JULY 30, 2009. The deadline to complete mediation is continued from March 30, 2009 to July 30, 2009. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on March 11, 2009. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/11/2009)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION TO RESET BRIEFING SCHEDULE. The deadline to exchange mediation briefs and to provide the briefs to the mediator is extended to March 25, 2009. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on March 9, 2009. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/9/2009)
|
|
Filing
11
PRETRIAL PREPARATION ORDER. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on 1/20/09. (fj, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/20/2009)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
