Bautista v. Salazar et al
| Mario Antonio Bautista |
| John F. Salazar and Matthew Cate |
| 3:2008cv04646 |
| October 7, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Habeas Corpus (General) Office |
| Riverside |
| Maxine M. Chesney |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
35
ORDER GRANTING 29 , 33 EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE TRAVERSE. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on December 13, 2010. (mmcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/13/2010)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER GRANTING 26 PETITIONER'S FOURTH REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE TRAVERSE. Signed by Judge Vaughn R. Walker for Maxine M. Chesney on July 14, 2010. (mmcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/14/2010)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER GRANTING 23 PETITIONER'S THIRD REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE TRAVERSE. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on April 23, 2010. (mmcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/23/2010)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER GRANTING 20 PETITIONER'S SECOND REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE TRAVERSE. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on January 13, 2010. (mmcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/13/2010)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER DENYING 12 PETITIONER'S RENEWED MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL AND 13 LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS; GRANTING 14 EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE TRAVERSE. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on October 6, 2009. (mmcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/6/2009)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER GRANTING 5 RESPONDENT'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on June 18, 2009. (mmcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/18/2009)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE; DISMISSING IMPROPER RESPONDENT; DENYING AS MOOT 3 APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS; DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE 2 MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL. The Clerk of the Court shall serve by certified mail a copy of this or der and the petition, along with all attachments thereto, upon respondent John F. Salazar and respondent's counsel, the Attorney General for the State of California. Respondent shall file with the Court and serve on petitioner, within ninety (90) days of the date this order is filed, an answer conforming in all respects to Rule 5 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, showing cause why a writ of habeas corpus should not be granted based on petitioner's cognizable claims. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on March 16, 2009. (mmcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/16/2009) Modified on 3/17/2009 (aaa, Court Staff).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
