Oculus Innovative Sciences, Inc. v. Prodinnv, S.A. de C.V. et al
| Oculus Innovative Sciences, Inc. |
| Prodinnv, S.A. de C.V. and Cesar Mangotich Pacheco |
| 3:2008cv04707 |
| October 10, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Contract: Other Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Bernard Zimmerman |
| None |
| Diversity |
| 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
77
CLERK'S JUDGMENT in favor of Oculus Innovative Sciences, Inc. against Prodinnv, S.A. de C.V., Cesar Mangotich Pacheco (tl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/17/2010)
|
|
Filing
76
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT. Granting in part and denying in part 51 Motion for Default Judgment. Plaintiff awarded compensatory damages and injunctive relief. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/16/2010)
|
|
Filing
70
ORDER DEFERRING RULING ON APPLICATION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT; AFFORDING PLAINTIFF OPPORTUNITY TO SUPPLEMENT APPLICATION; DENYING REQUEST FOR HEARING; CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. The Court defers ruling on Oculus's application for defau lt judgment, and gives Oculus leave to file, no later than October 8, 2010, supplemental declarations and a form of injunction. Oculus's request for a hearing on its application for default is denied; the case management conference is continued to December 10, 2010. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on September 8, 2010. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/8/2010)
|
|
Filing
55
ORDER CONTINUING JUNE 4, 2010 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. The Case Management Conference is continued to September 10, 2010. A Case Management Statement shall be filed no later than September 3, 2010. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on June 2, 2010. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/2/2010)
|
|
Filing
44
ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; DIRECTIONS TO PLAINTIFF. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on April 7, 2010. (mmcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/7/2010)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER DIRECTING ALL PARTIES TO FILE DOCUMENTS IN ENGLISH; STRIKING MANGOTICH'S NOVEMBER 24, 2009 FILING; EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR MANGOTICH TO FILE RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT; DIRECTIONS TO PLAINTIFF. Mangotich's November 24, 2009 response to the Complaint is stricken. The Court extends to March 12, 2010 the deadline for Mangotich to file his response in English. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on February 11, 2010. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/11/2010)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER FOR REASSIGNMENT. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bernard Zimmerman on 2/2/2010. (bzsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/2/2010)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bernard Zimmerman on 1/5/2010. (bzsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/5/2010)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE re 21 Letter filed by Oculus Innovative Sciences, Inc.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bernard Zimmerman on 11/30/2009. (bzsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/30/2009)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bernard Zimmerman on 5/18/2009. (bzsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/18/2009)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER Granting request for continuance 5 Declaration in Support filed by Oculus Innovative Sciences, Inc., 4 Case Management Statement filed by Oculus Innovative Sciences, Inc.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bernard Zimmerman on 1/20/09. (sv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/20/2009)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
