Yelp! Inc. v. Instaplak, Inc. et al
| Yelp! Inc. |
| Instaplak, Inc. and Michael Stephen Stern |
| 3:2008cv05761 |
| December 24, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Trademark Office |
| San Francisco |
| Edward M. Chen |
| Both |
| Federal Question |
| 15:1051 Trademark Infringement |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
35
ORDER DISMISSING CASE PURSUANT TO STIPULATION. Signed by Judge Alsup on December 29, 2009. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/29/2009)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER APPROVING STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER SUBJECT TO STATED CONDITIONS. Signed by Judge Alsup on August 4, 2009. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/4/2009)
|
|
Filing
30
STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO CONDUCT MEDIATION. PLEASE NOTE THERE WILL BE NO FURTHER CONTINUANCES. Signed by Judge William Alsup on 6/10/2009. (whasec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/10/2009)
|
|
Filing
20
SUPPLEMENTAL ORDER TO ORDER SETTING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE re 19 Clerks Notice. Signed by Judge William Alsup on 11/20/08. (dt, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/25/2009)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS INSTAPLAK, INC. AND MICHAEL STEPHEN STERN'S NOTICE OF SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL. Signed by Judge Alsup on March 19, 2009. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/19/2009)
|
|
Filing
8
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 7 Stipulation filed by Yelp! Inc.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 2/6/09. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/6/2009)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
