Chartrand v. Illinois Union Insurance Company
Plaintiff: Lloyd Chartrand
Defendant: Illinois Union Insurance Company
Case Number: 3:2008cv05805
Filed: December 31, 2008
Court: U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: Insurance Office
County: Sonoma
Presiding Judge: Jeffrey S. White
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Diversity
Jury Demanded By: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 7, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 40 ORDER GRANTING 39 Stipulation to Dismiss Case Without Prejudice. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 12/7/09. (jjo, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/7/2009)
November 10, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 38 ORDER DENYING 35 Stipulated Request for Reconsideration. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on November 10, 2009. (jswlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/10/2009)
October 22, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 34 ORDER DENYING 33 Stipulation Re: Publication of Order. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 10/22/09. (jjo, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/22/2009)
September 18, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 32 ORDER GRANTING 31 Joint Request for Continuance of Status Conference in Light of Pending Settlement. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 9/18/09. (jjo, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/18/2009)
August 28, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 30 ORDER by Judge Jeffrey S. White DENYING Defendant's 21 Motion for Summary Judgment and GRANTING 24 Plaintiff's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment. (jswlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/28/2009)
August 5, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER GRANTING 26 MOTION Reinstate prior schedule re 18 Order. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 8/5/09. (jjo, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/5/2009)
July 17, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE re 21 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Illinois Union Insurance Company. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on July 17, 2009. (jswlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/17/2009)
July 8, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER GRANTING 19 Stipulation on Scope of Summary Judgment Motion. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on July 8, 2009. (jswlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/8/2009)
June 30, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER GRANTING 17 Phased Discovery and Modify Trial Schedule Per Stipulation. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 6/30/09. (jjo, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/30/2009)
April 13, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER SCHEDULING TRIAL AND PRETRIAL MATTERS. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 4/13/09. (jjo, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/13/2009)
March 16, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER GRANTING 10 Stipulation Selecting Mediation. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on March 16, 2009. (jswlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/16/2009)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Chartrand v. Illinois Union Insurance Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lloyd Chartrand
Represented By: Michael Avery Mathews
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Illinois Union Insurance Company
Represented By: James Anthony Stankowski
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?