Rochin v. City of Concord et al
Jose O. Rochin |
City of Concord and Brandon Collins |
James Hodgkins |
3:2009cv00758 |
February 22, 2010 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Francisco Office |
James Larson |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 40 ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge James Larson on 4/28/10. (jlsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/28/2010) |
Filing 36 ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE DEADLINES re 35 Stipulation filed by Brandon Collins, City of Concord. Signed by Judge James Larson on 2/22/2010. (jlsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/22/2010) Modified on 2/22/2010 (jlsec, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 28 ORDER re 27 Stipulation filed by Jose O. Rochin. Signed by Judge James Larson on 11/17/09. (jlsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/17/2009) |
Filing 25 CASE MANAGEMENT AND PRETRIAL ORDER. Signed by Judge James Larson on 8/13/09. (jlsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/13/2009) |
Filing 24 CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER re 20 Case Management Statement filed by Brandon Collins, City of Concord. Signed by Judge James Larson on 8/12/09. (jlsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/12/2009) |
Filing 19 ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINES OF MEDIATION. Signed by Judge James Larson on 7/10/09. (jlsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/10/2009) |
Filing 12 STIPULATION AND ORDER REFERRING CASE to Mediation.. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 5/21/09. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/21/2009) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.