Amparo v. Adams et al
Marcos Amparo |
Derral G. Adams and Matthew Cate |
3:2009cv00801 |
February 24, 2009 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Habeas Corpus (General) Office |
Kings |
Maxine M. Chesney |
None |
Federal Question |
28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 27 ORDER DENYING PETITIONER'S REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME; DENYING PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR TRAVERSE. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on September 12, 2012. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/12/2012) |
Filing 23 ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS; DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY; DIRECTIONS TO CLERK. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on March 30, 2012. (mmcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/30/2012) |
Filing 21 ORDER GRANTING 20 PETITIONER'S SECOND REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE TRAVERSE; DIRECTIONS TO CLERK. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on July 8, 2011. (mmcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/8/2011) |
Filing 18 ORDER GRANTING 16 PETITIONER'S REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE TRAVERSE. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on April 29, 2011. (mmcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/29/2011) |
Filing 15 ORDER SCHEDULING FILING OF TRAVERSE. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on January 26, 2011. (mmcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/26/2011) |
Filing 14 ORDER GRANTING 13 EXTENSION OF TIME TO COMPLY WITH COURT ORDER; DIRECTIONS TO CLERK. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on October 22, 2010. (mmcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/22/2010) |
Filing 12 ORDER DENYING 3 LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED PETITION; DIRECTING PETITIONER TO ELECT TO PROCEED WITH OR STAY PETITION; GRANTING 10 PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR COPIES; DIRECTIONS TO CLERK AND RESPONDENT. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on August 2, 2010. (mmcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/2/2010) |
Filing 2 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Matthew Cate is hereby DISMISSED as a respondent to this action. The Clerk shall serve by certified mail a copy of this order, the petition and all attachments thereto on respondent and respondent's counsel, the Attorney Gen eral for the State of California. Respondent shall file with the Court and serve on petitioner, within ninety (90) days of the date this order is filed, an answer conforming in all respects to Rule 5 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, showing cause why a writ of habeas corpus should not be granted based on petitioner's cognizable claims. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on August 26, 2009. (mmcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/26/2009) Modified on 8/28/2009 (aaa, COURT STAFF). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.