Williams v. Curry
Petitioner: Gregory Wayne Williams
Respondent: Ben Curry
Case Number: 3:2009cv01925
Filed: May 4, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Francisco Office
County: Kings
Presiding Judge: Susan Illston
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 29, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 7 USCA ORDER : Denying the application for authorization to file a second or successive 28 U.S.C. ss2254 habeas corpus petition in the district court is denied. (ys, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/29/2010)
September 29, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 6 JUDGMENT: This action is dismissed without prejudice to him filing a new action if he ever obtains permission to do so from the United States Court of Appeals For the Ninth Circuit. (SI, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/29/2009)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Williams v. Curry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Gregory Wayne Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Ben Curry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?