United States of America v. Approximately $118,820 and $34,000 in United States Currency
| United States of America |
| Approximately $118,820 and $34,000 in United States Currency |
| 3:2009cv03963 |
| August 27, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| San Francisco |
| Edward M. Chen |
| None |
| 21 U.S.C. ยง 841 Forfeiture Property-Drugs |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
37
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 35 Status Report filed by United States of America. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 2/24/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/24/2012)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER CONTINUING STAY AND RESETTING CMC TO 3/2/12 re 32 Status Report filed by United States of America. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 12/9/11. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/9/2011)
|
|
Filing
28
CIVIL STANDING ORDER for U.S. District Judge Edward M. Chen. (slh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/8/2011)
|
|
Filing
27
STIPULATION AND ORDER RESETTING CMC re 26 Status Report filed by United States of America. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 5/27/11. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/27/2011)
|
|
Filing
25
STIPULATION AND ORDER RESETTING CMC TO 6/1/11 re 24 Status Report filed by United States of America. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 3/16/11. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/16/2011)
|
|
Filing
23
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 22 Status Report filed by United States of America Case Management Conference reset for 3/23/2011 01:30 PM in Courtroom C, 15th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 12/14/10. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/14/2010)
|
|
Filing
21
STIPULATION AND ORDER RESETTING CMC re 20 Status Report filed by United States of America. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 9/15/10. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/15/2010)
|
|
Filing
18
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO STAY PROCEEDING AND RESETTING CMC re 17 Proposed Order filed by United States of America Case Management Conference set for 9/1/2010 02:30 PM in Courtroom C, 15th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 4/20/10. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/20/2010)
|
|
Filing
15
STIPULATION AND ORDER resetting cmc from 3/3/10 to 4/21/10 14 Joint Case Management Statement filed by United States of America. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 3/1/10. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/1/2010)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: United States of America v. Approximately $118,820 and $34,000 in United States Currency | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | Natalie K. Wight |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Approximately $118,820 and $34,000 in United States Currency | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
