Castillo v. City Of Oakland et al
Raymond Castillo |
City Of Oakland, Oakland Police Department and B. Ocampo |
3:2009cv04679 |
October 1, 2009 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Francisco Office |
Alameda |
Susan Illston |
Plaintiff |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 79 ORDER DISMISSING CASE with prejudice upon settlement: Within 90 days from the date hereof, that settlement has not in fact occurred, the foregoing order shall be vacated and this cause shall forthwith be restored to the calendar for further proceedings. (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/18/2011) Modified on 2/18/2011 (ys, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 74 FINAL PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER (SI, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/8/2011) |
Filing 53 ORDER granting extension (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/26/2011) |
Filing 44 ORDER Continuing Deadlines for Expert Disclosures/Discovery (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/4/2010) |
Filing 42 ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT (SI, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/26/2010) |
Filing 33 ORDER EXCUSING OFFICE OCAMPO FROM ATTENDING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE re 32 Proposed Order filed by City Of Oakland. Signed by Judge James Larson on 9/15/10. (jlsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/15/2010) |
Filing 25 ORDER continuing settlement and motions deadline (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/4/2010) |
Filing 20 ORDER continuing cmc to 5/14/10 (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/15/2010) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.