Board of Trustees of the Automotive Industires Welfare Fund et al v. Capitol Expressway Ford, Inc.
| Board of Trustees of the Automotive Industires Welfare Fund, Automotive Industries Pension Fund and Jim Beno |
| Capitol Expressway Ford, Inc. |
| 3:2009cv04945 |
| October 16, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| Alameda |
| James Larson |
| None |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Benefits |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
39
ORDER SETTING ASIDE DEFAULT re 37 Stipulation, filed by Board of Trustees of the Automotive Industires Welfare Fund, Automotive Industries Pension Fund, Jim Beno. Signed by Judge James Larson on 2/2/11. (jlsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/2/2011)
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE re 35 Case Management Statement filed by Board of Trustees of the Automotive Industires Welfare Fund, Automotive Industries Pension Fund, Jim Beno. Signed by Judge James Larson on 1/10/11. (jlsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/10/2011)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER SUBSTITUTING ATTORNEYS re 26 Notice of Substitution of Counsel filed by Board of Trustees of the Automotive Industires Welfare Fund, Automotive Industries Pension Fund, Jim Beno. Signed by Judge James Larson on 10/21/10. (jlsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/21/2010)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
