Chanel, Inc. v. Lin et al
| Chanel, Inc. |
| Xiuyin Lin, Shiguan Wang and Zhongxioubin |
| 3:2009cv04996 |
| October 20, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| San Francisco |
| Joseph C. Spero |
| None |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 Trademark Infringement |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
56
JUDGMENT : Judgment is entered in favor of plaintiff and agaisnt defendants. (SI, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/21/2010)
|
|
Filing
45
ORDER GRANTING re 44 Letter filed by Chanel, Inc., for Stephen Gaffigan to appear telephonically on 4/16/10 at 9:30 AM. Court to initiate the phone contact. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 4/15/2010. (klh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/15/2010)
|
|
Filing
40
ORDER GRANTING re 38 Notice (Other)/Request Re: Case Management Conference filed by Chanel, Inc. Case mangement conference date of 3/12/10 at 1:30 PM has been taken off calendar. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 2/24/10. (klh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/24/2010)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER GRANTING re 23 Notice (Other) filed by Chanel, Inc., to Continue Case Management Conference currently set for 1/29/10 at 1:30 PM. Case Management Conference re-set for 3/12/2010 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom A, 15th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 1/26/10. (klh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/26/2010)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
