Maximum Availability Limited v. Vision Solutions, Inc. et al
| Maximum Availability Limited |
| Vision Solutions, Inc. and William Hammond |
| 3:2009cv05745 |
| December 7, 2009 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Bernard Zimmerman |
| Plaintiff |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
40
ORDER by Judge Charles R. Breyer granting 14 Motion to Transfer Case (crblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/25/2010)
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER regarding briefing schedule on pending motions re 30 Stipulation filed by William Hammond, Vision Solutions, Inc., Set/Reset Deadlines as to 30 Stipulation, 11 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction, 18 Ex Parte Application for a Te mporary Restraining Order and an Order to Show Cause re Preliminary Injunction; 14 MOTION to Transfer Case to Central District of California pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a).Amended opposition due by 2/9/2010. Replies due by 2/9/2010. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 2/5/2010. (be, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/10/2010)
|
|
Filing
9
STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT re 8 Stipulation filed by William Hammond, Vision Solutions, Inc.. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 12/31/09. (dt, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/31/2009)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
