Milton v. Jacquez et al
Robert Milton |
F. Jacquez, M. Cate, C. M. Patten, J. Akin, D. W. Bradbury, Chauser, J. Frisk and C. Parry |
3:2009cv05785 |
December 9, 2009 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Francisco Office |
Del Norte |
William H. Alsup |
Prisoner: Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 54 STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE re 52 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER of Dismissal with Prejudice filed by Chauser, M. Cate, C. M. Patten, D. W. Bradbury, J. Frisk, C. Parry, F. Jacquez, J. Akin. Signed by Judge William Alsup on 8/24/12. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(dt, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/24/2012) |
Filing 53 ORDER vacating status conference set for July 24, 2012. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nandor J. Vadas on 7/20/2012. (njvlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/20/2012) |
Filing 39 ORDER re 37 Writ Issued. Writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum for appearance of Plaintiff at settlement conference is vacated. (njvlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/29/2011) |
Filing 37 WRIT of habeas corpus ad testificandum issued for presence of Plaintiff at settlement conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nandor J. Vadas on 09/28/2011. (njvlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/28/2011) |
Filing 25 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Signed by Judge William Alsup on 1/25/11. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Service)(dt, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/27/2011) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.