Otis v. Kaiser Permanente et al
| Sherry Otis |
| Kaiser Permanente, Maynard Jenkins and Chris Robisch |
| 3:2010cv01234 |
| March 24, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| Edward M. Chen |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
45
STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL re 44 Stipulation filed by Sherry Otis, ***Deadlines terminated. 44 Stipulation filed by Sherry Otis.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 2/23/11. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/23/2011)
|
|
Filing
42
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER re 41 Stipulation filed by Kaiser Foundation Health Plan Inc. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 12/16/10. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/16/2010)
|
|
Filing
40
ORDER GRANTING CONTINUATION OF SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bernard Zimmerman on 12/10/2010. (bzsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/10/2010)
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER APPOINTMENT COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 11/23/10. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/23/2010)
|
|
Filing
34
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE REMOVAL OF EXHIBITS C AND D TO DECLARATION OF PLAINTIFF'S MOTIONTO APPOINT LIMITED-SCOPE COUNSEL re 33 Stipulation, filed by Kaiser Foundation Health Plan Inc. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 10/25/10. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/25/2010)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
