Ellis v. DotNext Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Maxine Ellis
Defendant: DotNext Inc., LeapFish, Inc., Behnam Behrouzi and Russell Safar
Case Number: 3:2010cv01599
Filed: April 14, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Francisco Office
County: San Joaquin
Presiding Judge: Bernard Zimmerman
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 9, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 78 STIPULATION AND ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bernard Zimmerman on 3/9/2011. (bzsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/9/2011)
February 22, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 76 STIPULATION AND ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bernard Zimmerman on 2/22/2011. (bzsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/22/2011)
February 9, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 73 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Bernard Zimmerman granting 65 Motion for Leave to File (bzsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/9/2011)
November 12, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 63 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Bernard Zimmerman granting 58 Motion to Continue (bzsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/12/2010)
September 8, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 52 STIPULATION AND ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bernard Zimmerman on 9/7/2010. (bzsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/8/2010)
July 22, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 43 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Bernard Zimmerman denying 7 Motion to Dismiss (bzsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/22/2010)
July 2, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 31 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Bernard Zimmerman finding as moot 6 Motion to Dismiss; granting 21 Motion to Amend/Correct ; 7/19/2010 is required to E-FILE the amended document (bzsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/2/2010)
June 29, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 23 STIPULATION AND ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bernard Zimmerman on 6/29/2010. (bzsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/29/2010)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ellis v. DotNext Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Maxine Ellis
Represented By: Bruce J. Highman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DotNext Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: LeapFish, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Behnam Behrouzi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Russell Safar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?