Hammer v. Computer Associate International, Inc. et al
| Lourdes Hammer |
| Computer Associate International, Inc. and CA, Inc. |
| 3:2010cv01942 |
| May 5, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Richard Seeborg |
| Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
30
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 29 FOR DISMISSAL OF CASE WITH PREJUDICE. ***Civil Case Terminated.Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 4/21/11. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/21/2011)
|
|
Filing
28
STANDBY ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Order to Show Cause Hearing set for 5/5/2011 01:30 PM. Show Cause Response due by 4/28/2011. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 3/10/11. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/10/2011)
|
|
Filing
26
STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING DATE BY WHICH TO COMPLETE ADR PROCESS. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 1/24/11. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/24/2011)
|
|
Filing
24
STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING DATE BY WHICH TO COMPLETE ADR PROCESS re 23 Stipulation filed by Lourdes Hammer. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 11/22/10. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/22/2010)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER RE 13 REASSIGNING CASE TO JUDGE SEEBORG. Initial Case Management Conference set for 8/26/2010 10:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 7/22/10. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/22/2010)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
