Silman v. Twin Cities Police Authority et al
| Stuart Silman |
| Twin Cities Police Authority and Patrick Eddinger |
| 3:2010cv02196 |
| May 21, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| Marin |
| Edward M. Chen |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
28
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 27 Stipulation filed by Patrick Eddinger, Twin Cities Police Authority. Signed by Judge James Ware on 08/31/11. (sis, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/31/2011)
|
|
Filing
20
STIPULATION AND ORDER. This Court, having considered the parties' STIPULATION TO EXTEND MEDIATOIN COMPLIANCE DEADLINE, TO COMPLETE PRE-MEDIATION DISCOVERY AND FOR DISCOVERY TO REMAIN OPEN AFTER MEDIATION, and good cause appearing, hereby orders as follows: (1) the mediation compliance deadline, currently scheduled for January 14, 2011, is extended to February 8, 2011; (2) party depositions and exchange of documents disclosed in the parties initial disclosures are to be completed prior to the February 7, 2011 mediation; and, (3) discovery to remain open after the mediation, doc 18 19 . Signed by Judge Vaughn R Walker on 1/13/2011. (cgk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/13/2011)
|
|
Filing
15
STIPULATION AND ORDER selecting ADR process. Case referred to Private ADR. Signed by Judge Vaughn R. Walker on 09/17/10. (rbe, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/17/2010)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
