Mack v. General Electric Company et al
James Mack |
General Electric Company, Todd Pacific Shipyards Corporation, General Dynamics Corporation, Northrop Grumman Shipbuilding, Inc., United States Steel Corporation and Lockheed Shipbuilding Company |
3:2010cv03165 |
July 20, 2010 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Francisco Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Jeffrey S. White |
P.I. : Asbestos |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 68 ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 3/6/2017. (lsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/6/2017) |
Filing 52 ORDER ALLOWING TRIAL EQUIPMENT. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 8/12/2014. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/12/2014) |
Filing 46 ORDER grantin 31 STIPULATION DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF DEFENDANT TODD PACIFIC SHIPYARDS CORPORATION filed by James Mack, Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 8/7/2014. Todd Pacific Shipyards Corporation terminated(beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/8/2014) |
Filing 19 ORDER RE: SETTLEMENT STATUS. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on 5/1/2014. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/1/2014) |
Filing 10 CTO ORDER 338 TRANSFERRING CASE to the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. Signed by Judge Jeffery N. Luthi on 8/19/10. (hdj, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/23/2010) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/25/2010: # 1 Transmittal) (hdj, COURT STAFF). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.