State of Missouri et al v. AU Optronics Corporation et al
| State of Missouri, State of Arkansas, State of Michigan, State of West Virginia and State of Wisconsin |
| AU Optronics Corporation, AU Optronics Corporation America, Chimei Innolux Corp., Chi Mei Optoelectronics USA, Inc., Chi Mei Optoelectronics Japan Co Ltd, Hannstar Display Corporation, Hitachi Ltd., Hitachi Displays Ltd., Hitachi Electronic Devices USA, Inc., LG Display Co. Ltd., LG Display America Inc., Samsung Electronics Co Ltd, Samsung Electronics America Inc, Samsung Semiconductor Inc., Sharp Corporation and Sharp Electronics Corporation |
| 3:2010cv03619 |
| August 17, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Edward M. Chen |
| Anti-Trust |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 15 Antitrust Litigation |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
166
FINAL JUDGMENT RE INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFF/STATE ENTITY CLASS ACTIONS. Signed by Judge Susan Illston on 4/1/13. (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/10/2013)
|
|
Filing
92
ORDER by Judge Susan Illston granting (5419) Stipulation in case 3:07-md-01827-SI IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by the undersigned DAPs, AGs, and LG Display, by and through their undersigned liaison counsel and subject to the concurrence of the Court, as follows:(1) The time for the undersigned DAPs and AGs served with LG Displays Motion to Amend to file their Oppositions to LG Displays Motion shall be extended to and including April 27, 2012. The DAPs shall file a single opposition brief to LG Displays Motion to Amend.(2) LG Displays time to file its Reply(ies) in support of its Motion shall be extended to and including May 8, 2012. (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/12/2012)
|
|
Filing
80
ORDER approving revised form of notice and resetting hearing.. Signed by Judge Illston on 2/2/12. (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/3/2012)
|
|
Filing
69
ORDER extending time for discovery Re: Wisconsin (filed in 10-3619 only) (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/10/2012)
|
|
Filing
68
ORDER granting exentsion re: discovery w/Judge's signature (#4488) (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/6/2012)
|
|
Filing
64
ORDER RE: PRELIMINARY APPROVAL HEARING (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/27/2011)
|
|
Filing
58
ORDER extending time for Discovery (Re: Wisconsin) #4253 (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/6/2011)
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER RE: STIPULATION and [proposed] Order Extending Time to Respond to Amended Complaint (State of Missouri, et al.) by Sharp Corporation, Sharp Electronics Corporation. (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/27/2011)
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER Order Extending Time to Respond to (State of Missouri, et al.) Amended Complaint by Sharp Corporation, Sharp Electronics Corporation. (Lutz, Lindsay)(COUNSEL IS DIRECTED TO INCLUDE THE CAPTION OF EACH CASE A DOCUMENT APPLIES TO)(tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/11/2011)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS (SI, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/11/2011)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
