Carten v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company et al
Mary Carten |
Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company and Group Long Term Disability Plan for Employees of FMR Corporation |
3:2010cv04019 |
September 8, 2010 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Francisco Office |
San Francisco |
James Larson |
Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 |
29 U.S.C. ยง 1001 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 40 ORDER DENYING SUMMARY JUDGMENT, ALLOWING LIMITED DISCOVERY, VACATING HEARING, AND SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE by Judge Alsup denying 32 Motion for Summary Judgment (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/28/2011) |
Filing 31 ORDER FOR ONE-DAY EXTENSION OF PARTIES' DEADLINES TO FILE MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT re 30 Stipulation, filed by Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company, Group Long Term Disability Plan for Employees of FMR Corporation. Signed by Judge Alsup on February 1, 2011. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/1/2011) |
Filing 19 ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S CLAIM UNDER ERISA SECTION 502(a)(3) AND VACATING HEARING by Judge Alsup denying 12 Motion to Dismiss (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/21/2010) |
Filing 14 SUPPLEMENTAL ORDER TO ORDER SETTING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE re 13 Clerks Notice. Signed by Judge William Alsup on 11/20/08. (dt, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/22/2010) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.