Trapasso v. Oakland Unified School District et al
| Joseph Trapasso |
| Oakland Unified School District, Oakland Unified School District Police Services, Larry Hillard and City of Oakland |
| 3:2010cv04260 |
| September 21, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| San Francisco |
| Bernard Zimmerman |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
35
CORRECTIVE NOTICE RE CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER [re 30 Case Management Scheduling Order, Order Referring Case to Magistrate Judge for Settlement]. Signed by Judge William Alsup on 1/7/2011. (whasec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/7/2011)
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER REGARDING SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEYS. Signed by Judge Alsup on January 5, 2011. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/5/2011)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION DISMISSING DEFENDANTS, WITHDRAWING MOTIONS, AND SETTING DEADLINE FOR ANSWER. Signed by Judge Alsup on November 29, 2010. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/29/2010)
|
|
Filing
21
SUPPLEMENTAL ORDER TO ORDER SETTING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE re 20 Clerks Notice. Signed by Judge William Alsup on 11/20/08. (dt, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/10/2010)
|
|
Filing
13
BRIEFING ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bernard Zimmerman on 11/1/2010. (bzsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/1/2010)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
