The People of the State of California v. Guajardo et al
The People of the State of California |
Martin R. Guajardo, Christopher Stender and Immigration Practice Group, P.C. |
3:2010cv05658 |
December 12, 2010 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Francisco Office |
San Francisco |
Jeffrey S. White |
Other Statutory Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 38 ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES AND COSTS by Judge Alsup denying 28 Motion for Attorney Fees (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/21/2011) |
Filing 33 ORDER REMANDING ACTION TO STATE COURT AND ORDER TO GIVE NOTICE TO AGENCIES REGULATING IMMIGRATION LAWYERS by Judge Alsup granting 18 Motion to Remand (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/7/2011) |
Filing 32 SUPPLEMENTAL ORDER TO ORDER SETTING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE re 31 Clerks Notice. Signed by Judge William Alsup on 11/20/08. (dt, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/5/2011) |
Filing 22 ORDER SHORTENING TIME RE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REMAND. Signed by Judge Alsup on December 27, 2010. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/27/2010) |
Filing 16 ORDER OF RECUSAL. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 12/22/10. (tehlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/22/2010) |
Filing 10 ORDER of Recusal. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on December 21, 2010. (jswlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/21/2010) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.