Mitchell v. Acumed, LLC
Plaintiff: Randall Ray Mitchell
Defendant: Acumed, LLC
Case Number: 3:2011cv00752
Filed: February 18, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Francisco Office
County: Marin
Presiding Judge: Samuel Conti
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury- Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 2, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 86 STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge Samuel Conti on 7/2/12. (tdm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/2/2012)
March 8, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 74 ORDER GRANTING 56 MOTION for Sanctions. Signed by Judge Nathanael M. Cousins on 03/08/12. (nclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/8/2012)
February 23, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 73 ORDER re 72 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge Nathanael M. Cousins on 02/23/12. (nclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/23/2012)
February 7, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 71 ORDER re 70 Status Report. Signed by Judge Nathanael M. Cousins on February 7, 2012. (nclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/7/2012)
January 23, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 65 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Signed by Judge Nathanael M. Cousins on January 23, 2012. (nclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/23/2012)
January 4, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 60 STIPULATION AND ORDER, Motions terminated: 51 MOTION Continue Trial Date and Related Pretrial Deadlines (Stipulated) filed by Acumed, LLC. Discovery due by 8/23/2012. Jury Selection set for 10/22/2012 10:00 AM in Courtroom 1, 17th Fl oor, San Francisco before Hon. Samuel Conti. Jury Trial set for 10/22/2012 09:30 AM in Courtroom 1, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Samuel Conti. Motion Hearing set for 8/31/2012 10:00 AM in Courtroom 1, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Samuel Conti. Pretrial Conference set for 10/5/2012 10:00 AM in Courtroom 1, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Samuel Conti.. Signed by Judge Samuel Conti on 1/4/12. (tdm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/4/2012)
June 13, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 37 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 7 Motion to Dismiss; granting 8 Motion to Strike ; denying 19 Motion to Remand (sclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/13/2011)
June 2, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 34 STIPULATION AND ORDER Case Management Conference set for 6/10/11 is continued to 8/26/2011 10:00 AM in Courtroom 1, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Samuel Conti.. Signed by Judge Samuel Conti on 6/1/11. (tdm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/2/2011)
May 26, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 32 ORDER REQUIRING SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING (sclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/26/2011)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mitchell v. Acumed, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Randall Ray Mitchell
Represented By: J. Frank George
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Acumed, LLC
Represented By: Genese Kay Dopson
Represented By: Beth A. Fruechtenicht
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?