Modern Bridal, Inc. v. Soolip, Inc. et al
| Modern Bridal, Inc. |
| Wanda Wen and Soolip, Inc. |
| 3:2011cv00917 |
| February 28, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| Contra Costa |
| Joseph C. Spero |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
76
STIPULATION ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 3/14/12. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/14/2012)
|
|
Filing
63
ORDER GRANTING re 62 Notice of Substitution of Counsel filed by Modern Bridal, Inc. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 11/23/11. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/23/2011)
|
|
Filing
41
ORDER GRANTING re 40 Letter filed by Modern Bridal, Inc., for Laura Koch to appear by phone on 10/14/11 at 1:30 PM. Signed, as modified, by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 10/11/11. (klh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/11/2011)
|
|
Filing
39
ORDER re 38 Letter filed by Soolip Wedding, LLC, for Heather Cibula to appear by phone on 10/14/11 at 1:30 PM. Signed, as modified, by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 10/7/11. (klh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/7/2011)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER GRANTING Defendants' Request to Appear by Telephone at the CMC on 9/9/2011. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 09/08/2011. (tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/8/2011)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
