New Sensations, Inc v. Does 1 - 1474
Plaintiff: New Sensations, Inc
Defendant: Does 1 - 1474
Case Number: 3:2011cv02770
Filed: June 7, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Francisco Office
County: Los Angeles
Presiding Judge: Maria-Elena James
Nature of Suit: Copyrights
Cause of Action: 17 U.S.C. ยง 101
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 15, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 102 ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 12/15/2011. (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/15/2011)
December 7, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 93 ORDER RE JURISDICTION Status Report due by 12/14/2011.. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 12/7/2011. (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/7/2011)
December 5, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 89 ORDER DENYING OBJECTIONS TO SUBPOENA re 85 Objection filed by Doe 1335. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 12/5/2011. (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/5/2011)
December 1, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 83 ORDER by Judge Maria-Elena James denying 82 Motion to Quash re IP Address 24.176.24.5 (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/1/2011)
November 30, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 79 ORDER by Judge Maria-Elena James denying 78 Motion to Dismiss; denying 78 Motion to Quash re: Doe Defendant 1340 (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/30/2011)
November 16, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 46 ORDER by Judge Maria-Elena James striking 42 Motion to Quash; striking 42 Motion to Dismiss as to Doe Defendant #173 (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/16/2011)
November 15, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 40 ORDER by Judge Maria-Elena James denying 22 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/15/2011)
November 14, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 35 ORDER by Judge Maria-Elena James denying 33 Doe Defendant 647's Motion to Quash (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/14/2011)
November 10, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 31 ORDER by Judge Maria-Elena James denying 29 Motion to Quash (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/10/2011)
November 1, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER re 22 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by Doe #37, IP Address 108.34.138.72. Plaintiff's response due 11/14/2011.. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 11/1/2011. (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/1/2011)
October 31, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 21 AMENDED ORDER re 15 Order on Motion to Dismiss, Order on Motion to Quash. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 10/31/2011. (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/31/2011)
October 26, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER by Judge Maria-Elena James denying 14 Motion to Dismiss; denying 14 Motion to Quash (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/26/2011)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: New Sensations, Inc v. Does 1 - 1474
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: New Sensations, Inc
Represented By: Ira M. Siegel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 - 1474
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?