Edel v. Schering-Plough Group Benefits Plan et al
Plaintiff: Perri Edel
Defendant: Schering-Plough Group Benefits Plan, Merck & Co., Inc. and Schering-Plough Corporation
Case Number: 3:2011cv02778
Filed: June 7, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Francisco Office
County: San Mateo
Presiding Judge: Thelton E. Henderson
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 12, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 29 STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 01/12/2012. (tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/12/2012)
November 22, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ORDER by Judge Thelton E. Henderson granting in part and denying in part 20 Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss Counterclaim. The motion is granted as to the Plan and denied as to LINA. The case management conference scheduled for 11/28/11 is continued to 01/30/12 at 1:30 PM in Courtroom No. 12. The parties shall file a joint case management conference statement by 01/23/12. (tehlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/22/2011)
November 2, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER RE ATTENDANCE AT MEDIATION. Signed by Judge Elizabeth D Laporte on 11/2/2011. (kns, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/2/2011)
September 13, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 15 STIPULATION AND ORDER Selecting ADR Process, Case referred to mediation. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 09/12/2011. (tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/13/2011)
July 5, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 10 STIPULATION AND ORDER: Defendant has to 8/1/11 to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. Signed by Judge Thelton Henderson on 6/30/11. (tdm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/5/2011)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Edel v. Schering-Plough Group Benefits Plan et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Perri Edel
Represented By: Karen Kay Wind
Represented By: Laurence Fred Padway
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Schering-Plough Group Benefits Plan
Represented By: Adrienne Clare Publicover
Represented By: Charan M. Higbee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Merck & Co., Inc.
Represented By: Charan M. Higbee
Represented By: Adrienne Clare Publicover
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Schering-Plough Corporation
Represented By: Charan M. Higbee
Represented By: Adrienne Clare Publicover
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?