Edel v. Schering-Plough Group Benefits Plan et al
Perri Edel |
Schering-Plough Group Benefits Plan, Merck & Co., Inc. and Schering-Plough Corporation |
3:2011cv02778 |
June 7, 2011 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Francisco Office |
San Mateo |
Thelton E. Henderson |
Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 |
29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 29 STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 01/12/2012. (tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/12/2012) |
Filing 26 ORDER by Judge Thelton E. Henderson granting in part and denying in part 20 Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss Counterclaim. The motion is granted as to the Plan and denied as to LINA. The case management conference scheduled for 11/28/11 is continued to 01/30/12 at 1:30 PM in Courtroom No. 12. The parties shall file a joint case management conference statement by 01/23/12. (tehlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/22/2011) |
Filing 23 ORDER RE ATTENDANCE AT MEDIATION. Signed by Judge Elizabeth D Laporte on 11/2/2011. (kns, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/2/2011) |
Filing 15 STIPULATION AND ORDER Selecting ADR Process, Case referred to mediation. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 09/12/2011. (tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/13/2011) |
Filing 10 STIPULATION AND ORDER: Defendant has to 8/1/11 to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. Signed by Judge Thelton Henderson on 6/30/11. (tdm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/5/2011) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.