McConnell v. Red Robin International, Inc.
Plaintiff: Kevin McConnell
Defendant: Red Robin International, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2011cv03026
Filed: June 20, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Francisco Office
County: San Francisco
Presiding Judge: William Alsup
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 11, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 63 ORDER GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISQUALIFY PLAINTIFF MCCONNELL AND MOTION FOR SANCTIONS by Judge William Alsup [granting in part and denying in part 51 Motion]. (whasec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/11/2012)
April 17, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 59 ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND VACATING HEARING by Judge William Alsup [granting in part and denying in part 47 Motion for Leave to File]. (whasec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/17/2012)
April 5, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 52 ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING ON MOTIONS TO DISQUALIFY AND RESCHEDULING HEARING re 51 Supplemental MOTION Supplemental Motion to Disqualify Plaintiff Kevin McConnell as Class Representative and for Monetary Sanctions Against Plaintiff McConnell and M ichael Hoffman in the Amount of $15,985.00 filed by Red Robin International, Inc., 41 MOTION Disqualify Plaintiff Kevin McConnell as Class Representative filed by Red Robin International, Inc. Motion Hearing set for 5/10/2012 08:00 AM in Courtroom 8, 19th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. William Alsup.. Signed by Judge Alsup on April 5, 2012. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/5/2012)
March 13, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 40 ORDER REGARDING MOTION TO DETERMINE ADEQUACY OF CLASS REPRESENTATIVE re 38 Notice (Other) filed by Red Robin International, Inc.. Signed by Judge Alsup on March 13, 2012. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/13/2012)
March 7, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 36 ORDER REGARDING EVIDENTIARY HEARING re 32 Order. Signed by Judge Alsup on March 7, 2012. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/7/2012)
February 24, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 32 ORDER SCHEDULING EVIDENTIARY HEARING. Signed by Judge Alsup on February 24, 2012. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/24/2012)
February 22, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANT'S RESPONSE TO LETTER BRIEF re 27 Letter filed by Red Robin International, Inc.. Signed by Judge Alsup on February 22, 2012. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/22/2012)
September 29, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 19 MEMORANDUM OPINION REGARDING FACTORS TO BE EVALUATED FOR ANY PROPOSED CLASS SETTLEMENT (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/29/2011)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: McConnell v. Red Robin International, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kevin McConnell
Represented By: Michael Hoffman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Red Robin International, Inc.
Represented By: Catherine M. Dacre
Represented By: William James Dritsas
Represented By: Aryeh Matthew Hersher
Represented By: Robb Drew McFadden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?