Pension Trust Fund for Operating Engineers et al v. Kickin Corporation et al
| Pension Trust Fund for Operating Engineers, F.G. Crosthwaite and Russell E. Burns |
| Kickin Corporation, Superior DVBE, Inc. and Steve Lawrence Schaller |
| 3:2011cv03685 |
| July 27, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| Alameda |
| Joseph C. Spero |
| Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1451 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
76
CLERK'S NOTICE of Renewal of Judgment issued in the amount of $33,449.41 (msr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/30/2023)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) Modified on 1/30/2023 (msr, COURT STAFF).
|
|
Filing
71
WRIT of Execution issued as to Kickin Enterprises in the amount of $32,999.85. (slhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/1/2013)
|
|
Filing
67
STANDING ORDER. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 1/28/13. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/28/2013)
|
|
Filing
65
ORDER, Case reassigned to Hon. Edward M. Chen. Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero no longer assigned to the case.. Signed by Executive Committee on 12/26/12. (ha, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/26/2012)
|
|
Filing
60
ORDER VACATING NOVEMBER 30, 2012 HEARING. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on November 16, 2012. (jcslc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/16/2012)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
