Boyter v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
Plaintiff: Robert Boyter
Defendant: NDEX West, LLC, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2011cv03943
Filed: August 10, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Francisco Office
County: Contra Costa
Presiding Judge: Susan Illston
Nature of Suit: Foreclosure
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 30, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 59 JUDGMENT (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 4/30/2012)
April 11, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 55 ORDER RE: DEADLINE FOR FILING AMENDED COMPLAINT (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 4/11/2012)
April 4, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 53 ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS 42 (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 4/4/2012)
February 14, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 44 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO EXPUNGE LIS PENDENS, DENYING DEFENDANTS' REQUEST FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES; DENYING PLAINTIFF'S EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR ORDER TO INVALIDATE FORECLOSURE SALE; AND CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 2/14/2012)
January 19, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 36 ORDER continuing ADR conference. Signed by Judge Illston on 1/19/12. (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/19/2012)
December 14, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 33 ORDER GRANTING PARTIES' REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE; REFERRING CASE TO ADR UNIT FOR ASSESSMENT TELEPHONE CONFERENCE (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 12/14/2011) (Additional attachment(s) added on 12/14/2011: # 1 Envelope) (tf, COURT STAFF).
November 9, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR A CONTINUANCE AND RESCHEDULING ALL PENDING MOTIONS TO DECEMBER 22, 2011 AT 9:00 AM (SI, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/9/2011)
October 13, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER RESCHEDULING HEARING ON MOTIONS TO NOVEMBER 18, 2011 (SI, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/13/2011)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Boyter v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: NDEX West, LLC
Represented By: Thomas K Agawa
Represented By: Edward A. Treder
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Represented By: Jonathan Michael Zak
Represented By: Ronald M. Arlas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.
Represented By: Ronald M. Arlas
Represented By: Jonathan Michael Zak
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Robert Boyter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?