Californians for Alternatives to Toxics v. North Coast Railroad Authority et al
Plaintiff: Californians for Alternatives to Toxics
Defendant: Board of Directors of North Coast Railroad Authority and North Coast Railroad Authority
Case Number: 3:2011cv04102
Filed: August 19, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Francisco Office
County: Marin
Presiding Judge: Joseph C. Spero
Nature of Suit: Environmental Matters
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 8, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 52 Order by Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero granting 9 Motion to Remand.(jcslc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/8/2012)
March 30, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 49 STIPULATION AND ORDER as to (9 in 3:11-cv-04102-JCS) RE MOTION to Remand, (8 in 3:11-cv-04103-JCS) RE MOTION to Remand to State Court and for Attorneys' Fees. Motion Hearing re-set for 5/10/2012 at 11:00 AM (special setting) in Court room G, 15th Floor, San Francisco before Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero. Case Management Conference re-set for 5/10/2012 at 11:00 AM in Courtroom G, 15th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 3/30/12. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/30/2012)
December 22, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 33 ORDER GRANTING re (32 in 3:11-cv-04102-JCS) Stipulation/Amendment to Stay filed by North Coast Railroad Authority, (20 in 3:11-cv-04103-JCS) Stipulation/Amendment to Stay filed by North Coast Railroad Authority. STAY is extended to 1/26/12. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 12/21/11. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/22/2011)
November 17, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 31 AMENDMENT TO STAY AND ORDER. Stay extended until 12/26/11. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 11/16/11. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/17/2011)
September 27, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 23 STIPULATION AND ORDER MODIFYING BRIEFING SCHEDULE as to 9 MOTION to Remand. Responses due by 10/14/2011. Replies due by 10/21/2011. Motion Hearing set for 11/18/2011 01:30 PM in Courtroom G, 15th Floor, San Francisco before Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero.. Signed, AS MODIFIED, by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 09/26/2011. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/27/2011) Modified on 9/27/2011 (klhS, COURT STAFF).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Californians for Alternatives to Toxics v. North Coast Railroad Authority et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Board of Directors of North Coast Railroad Authority
Represented By: Christopher James Neary
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: North Coast Railroad Authority
Represented By: Christopher James Neary
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Californians for Alternatives to Toxics
Represented By: William Leonard Verick
Represented By: Sharon Eileen Duggan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?