Hilber v. International Lining Technology

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit California Northern District Hilber v. International Lining Technology

Hilber v. International Lining Technology

Plaintiff:	Michael A. Hilber
Defendant:	International Lining Technology
Case Number:	4:2012cv00003
Filed:	January 3, 2012
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office:	Oakland Office
County:	XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge:	Laurel Beeler
Nature of Suit:	Employment
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
July 24, 2012	Filing 37 ORDER GRANTING IN PART and DENYING IN PART 32 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint. Defendant's motion is GRANTED to the extent that it seeks dismissal of Plaintiff's possibly-alleged claim for viol ation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324a, and this claim is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Defendant's motion is DENIED in all other respects. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(a)(4)(A), ILT shall answer Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint within 14 days of the date of this order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler on 7/24/2012. (lblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/24/2012)
May 18, 2012	Filing 24 ORDER GRANTING 10 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Plaintiff may file a First Amended Complaint within 21 days from the date of this order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler on 5/18/2012.(lblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/18/2012)

Date Filed

Document Text

July 24, 2012

Filing 37 ORDER GRANTING IN PART and DENYING IN PART 32 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint. Defendant's motion is GRANTED to the extent that it seeks dismissal of Plaintiff's possibly-alleged claim for viol ation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324a, and this claim is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Defendant's motion is DENIED in all other respects. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(a)(4)(A), ILT shall answer Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint within 14 days of the date of this order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler on 7/24/2012. (lblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/24/2012)

May 18, 2012

Filing 24 ORDER GRANTING 10 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Plaintiff may file a First Amended Complaint within 21 days from the date of this order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler on 5/18/2012.(lblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/18/2012)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hilber v. International Lining Technology
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael A. Hilber
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: International Lining Technology
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?